This postcard wound its way into my e-mail box after the August 5 primary. It was mailed out shortly before the election, by the eventual winner of the Republican primary, Paul Welday. He rightly touts his Detroit News endorsement, as well as the conservative political action committees that have endorsed him.
And then he took it all just a step too far. The other two quotes, from the Farmington Observer and Detroit Free Press, were lifted directly from endorsements for Welday’s primary rival, Richard Lerner. For instance, while the Observer did say Welday was qualified, here’s the full sentence:
“Paul Welday, with his heavy GOP connections and lobbying background, is qualified to be a state rep, but resumes aren’t everything in this election. Party isn’t everything in this election. There is still much healing to be had in Lansing before we can see an effective state Legislature. We need cooperation, leadership and a shared vision of how to turn this state around, now. That doesn’t include time-consuming partisan bickering and posturing that we’ve seen in recent sessions.”
And here’s the truth of what the Free Press had to say: “The biggest name in the GOP race is Paul Welday, 49, of Farmington Hills, a former executive director of the Oakland County Republican Party who has most recently worked as a lobbyist. He’s a skilled political strategist who knows Lansing and many of its leaders, and he is well versed on the state’s economic issues. However, what political newcomer Richard Lerner lacks in political connections, he more than makes up for with thoughtful, specific ideas about repealing the Michigan Business Tax, making the state’s expenditures accessible to the public online, and setting a 100-day legislative agenda, after which lawmakers would be docked pay for every day of gridlock. Lerner, 49, of Farmington Hills, would be a solid, issues-oriented challenger for Democrat Vicki Barnett, a former Farmington Hills mayor who is unopposed on the Democratic side.”
This tactic of delivering carefully selected words to distort the truth is exactly the argument both editorials made against his candidacy: Welday’s a political player, a gamesman, and we don’t need more game-playing in the State House.
What’s sad is that Welday has plenty of endorsements from conservative icons – he didn’t need to steal the few choice words from those that weren’t his. He’s also got a decent platform (although he appears to have boiled the issues section of his Web site down to a graphic with 10 points) and at least one good idea. Be nice if he just ran on those this time around.
—Joni Hubred-Golden
Enterprise Publisher